I guess you haven't seen these reviews!
Baltimore Sun: 10.5 Leopard is most significant upgrade to Mac OS X since 10.2 Jaguar - November 15, 2007
ExtremeTech: Microsoft’s Windows Vista simply can’t compete with Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard - November 12, 2007
Computerworld: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard spanks Microsoft’s Windows Vista - November 07, 2007
Salon: It’s time to buy an Apple Mac; Macs cost less to own than PCs - November 06, 2007
Chicago Tribune reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: Further proof that computing needn’t be stressful - November 03, 2007
Fast Company: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard handily outshines all other computing interfaces - November 02, 2007
Houston Chronicle reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: A winner for Mac users and Windows switchers - November 01, 2007
MSNBC reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘An even better experience with an already excellent OS’ - November 01, 2007
PC Magazine reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘By far the best operating system ever written…’ - October 30, 2007
Apple sells two million copies of Mac OS X Leopard in first weekend - October 30, 2007
CNET’s Reisinger: Apple’s Leopard will open the Mac OS X floodgates and embarrass Microsoft - October 29, 2007

Clearly the author of the article has yet to use Leopard, and simply regurgitating FUD from other sources. The bug referenced is when you move files, but that is NOT the default behavior of the OS. The default action is copy. One actually Cmd-Move the files for you to move files. Simply clicking a file and dragging it to another folder copies it.

I cannot comment on customer service in Israel, but here in the US it is exemplary. Whether phone, email or in-store, I do not have any complaints with their service quality.

I have been using OS X for over a year now, and installed Leopard the day it was released. I have no complaints. Everything "just works"

I can't speak to your experience in Israel, of course. And I'm wholly sympathetic to "glitches" in operating systems that wipe out whole swaths of data. Anybody who remembers the data compression built into DOS 5.0 will relate.

But criticisms of Apple's customer service just make my eyes glaze over. My own experience with Apple has been of stunning follow-thru on my problems with hardware and software.

The warranty on Apple products is particularly stunning. I experienced a DVD-RW failure on my 13.1" MacBook (late 2006). I went to the Apple store, had the unit checked out by a Genius at the Genius Bar, who agreed that there was a hardware failure. My choices were: 1) have the store fix the machine. There would be a $50 charge to backup the hard drive, Apple service in Cincinnati would repair the laptop, and I'd have my computer back in roughly 5 business days. 2) Backup the hard drive myself, and have Apple send a shipper. I would send the laptop myself in the shipper, and Apple would repair and return the laptop within 5 business days.
I decided on option 2, mostly because I find it hard to part with the machine, and wanted to effect the repair on my own schedule. As promised, Apple sent a shipper WITHIN TWO DAYS, and when I was ready with my backup, I sent it off to the Apple Repair Center from my place of work (DHL handled the shipping).
That was on a Thursday. On Friday morning, I got an email saying that my machine was received. Late that morning, another email said that repair was underway. And finally, by 5:30pm, I received a last email saying that my machine was repaired, and had been shipped back to me, and here's the tracking number.
I had my machine back by Monday, when I found it in the original shipper on my front porch (discreetly hid; thank you DHL). The bill of lading outlined the repairs: Apple had replaced the Matsushita DVD-RW drive (Matshita), AND had also replaced the 2.5" Seagate hard drive with a newer, faster 1.5 gigabit Toshiba model, AND had replaced the keyboard, AND replaced the trackpad, AND replaced the entire keyboard top. It's still the same computer; the serial number is the same.
I didn't mention that all this happened on the last day of the original warranty. And everything works, wonderfully. Of course, I had to replace everything on my hard drive (the latest version of Tiger was already installed, though), but since I had another Mac to backup to, that was relatively painless.
I really don't know what people expect out of customer service anymore; the range of response seems to be all over the graph. I DO feel that response like this, where the service is rapid, complete, and ABOVE the level of expectation is rare, and I commend Apple on the responsiveness of the company to my situation.
So when I read comments like those in this blog, where people feel Apple is slipping on its commitment to the customer, I have to ask, have you ever dealt with Apple customer care directly? When you had a problem, did you feel blown off, or did the company do its best to hold up its end of the service agreement?
Based on my experience, I'd have to ask how anyone who has dealt with Apple directly could feel that the company didn't at least try to satisfy the customer. That would be part of the reason why Apple machines continue to sell at a premium.

I've read many reviews on Leopard and I've not read one which I consider the reviewer giving a "lukewarm" reception.

Even PC Magazine (the home of Microsoft fans) gives it 4.5 stars out of 5.

While Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) has had a long history of launching large OS upgrades only to follow them on with numerous patches, Apple has always prided itself on releasing fully-baked software.

This is where an author can really show their ignorance. Every major Apple release (OSX, iTunes, etc.) is always followed up with a.b.x updates. No major software is fully baked these days--too complicated. It's all about rapidly fixing the problems.

There is this strawman Apple I read about in the press that Leopard is compared to. An Apple where there are never any bugs or updates, an Apple whose advocates never criticize the holy releases of Apple. These are clues that we are reading an article from someone whose view of Apple is via The Legend of Apple and Its Fanboys. The metaphorical movie version of Apple.

Reminds me of a former president that could separate real history from movie moments.

In reality, there's no news here.

Just who in the hell is Tom's Guide anyway? You guys can do better than regurgitate FUD from questionable sources can't you? Think for yourself and for God's sake if you are going to base your entire story on someone else's story use a good source. Leopard has been overwhelmingly been heralded as being the BEST OS out there BAR NONE!!

Hasn't the "most troublesome bug" with the finder been resolved for over a week?

This "review" does not seem like it was too hands on.

And to presume ANYONE would switch back to "the dark side" after using both Leopard and Vista is absurd.

Worst. Review. Ever.

If you love mac, you'll truly hate Leopard.

Made to convert windows users, it's incompatible with previous versions of OS X, unless you have an intel chip.

I have a G5 with 1.5 gb ram and 200 gb hard drive and it's slower than computers 20 years ago.

Any true mac user should stick to previous versions of os x or even 9.

Unfortunately it's too late for me as I have to backup my entire drive, erase and reinstall. There's not even a way to uninstall the operating system.

Unless you're converting from Windows or an Intel Mac, you will be truly frustrated, disappointed, and pissed off!

Your comments and experience are idiosyncratic and bizarre.

As most professional reviews--and my own personal experience--attest, Leopard is the fastest version of Mac OS X yet, even on "Quicksilver" G4-based Power Macs dating back to July 2001.

Leopard not only provides worthwhile user-oriented features, it also provides powerful and productive new facilities and interfaces for developers. I look forward to the applications they will engender.