<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Twitter finally reveals revenue ambition, wants to be Google -- but not yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/rsz_twitter_bird.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/twitter" target="_blank">Twitter</a> calls Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) a "good role model," <a href="http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=2615219&amp;videoChannel=6" target="_blank">but says it isn't ready to rush down the road to advertising</a>. </p>
<p>Nonetheless, an ad-based revenue model is something that cofounder Biz Stone says they "will be looking to do down the line." But, for now, he continues, Twitter is focused on "creating value for our users." For now, revenue generation ideas are being put on paper, "and we're definitely going to get to them," Stone says.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Twitter finally reveals revenue ambition, wants to be Google -- but not yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/">Twitter finally reveals revenue ambition, wants to be Google -- but not yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249031/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/twitter-finally-reveals-revenue-ambition-wants-to-be-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>biz stone</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>microblogging</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>reid hoffman</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networks</category><category>twitter</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google says: Chrome for Christmas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/google-logo-200x150.jpg" />Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is letting a few developers peek behind the curtain. The early look the company's new operating system, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Chrome/">Chrome</a>, is happening in true Google style: by invitation only. When it's released, <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/google-chrome-operating-system-to-arrive-for-the-2010-holidays.html" target="_blank">which should be in time for the holidays</a>, developers will be able to bang away at an open source solution, tapping an army of volunteers who are eager to work for bragging rights.</p>
<p>The open source version is called <a href="http://www.chromium.org" target="_blank">Chromium OS</a>, which will hit the market a year before the "consumer" version is ready, which is how Google will be able to tap the wisdom of developers around the world. <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/releasing-chromium-os-open-source.html" target="_blank">In a blog entry, Google explained</a>, "This means the code is free, accessible to anyone and open for contributions." The project includes the code base, user interface experiments and some preliminary designs, all of which can be used for ongoing development efforts. To energize the potential base of contributors, Google said that "development will be done in the open from this point on."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google says: Chrome for Christmas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/">Google says: Chrome for Christmas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/21/google-says-chrome-for-christmas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrome</category><category>ChromeOs</category><category>chromium</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>open source</category><category>open source os</category><category>open source software</category><category>operating systems</category><category>source code</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! wants in on Twitter: No money involved]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/yahoo_logo_200x150.jpg" alt="" />Yahoo! (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) is the latest company that <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/hotsites/2009-11-19-yahoo-twitter-search_N.htm" target="_blank">wants to optimize its search results for Twitter</a>. This follows moves by Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) and Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) to integrate <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> data into their search results. Unlike its competitors, however, Yahoo! wants to do this without spending a dime (well, without giving a dime to the hot new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialmedia/">social media</a> platform).</p>
<p>Twitter's microblogging service has become famous not only for its rapid growth but also because it's found no way to turn it into revenue. Its recent discussions with Microsoft and Google demonstrated that Twitter can indeed bring in some cash -- by licensing its data for use in fine-tuning search engines. With two of the top search engines now optimizing for Twitter, it was only a matter of time before Yahoo! would rush to join the party.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! wants in on Twitter: No money involved</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/">Yahoo! wants in on Twitter: No money involved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/hotsites/2009-11-19-yahoo-twitter-search_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search engines</category><category>social media</category><category>socialnetworking</category><category>twitter</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/gme-gamestop-logo.jpg" />GameStop (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gamestop-corp-new/gme/nys">GME</a>) posted what I thought was a mediocre <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/gamestop-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272403653?channel=pf">third quarter</a>. Total sales went up about 8%, and earnings per share increased a few pennies to 31 cents. When you think video games, you think growth. That doesn't feel like growth, does it? Not the kind that sends a stock to the moon, certainly. Furthermore, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> saw a decrease of 7.8%, driven by lackluster hardware transactions. Indeed, we may be hitting a point in the console cycle where the demand for systems from Sony (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), and Nintendo (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) has essentially been satiated.
<p>Here's the big question on the mind of traders: unimpressive Q3 or not, should GameStop be bought now? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/">GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/gamestop-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272403653?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>gamestop</category><category>GME</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>retail</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Futures lower on economic concerns; retail, tech in focus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crm/" rel="tag">salesforce.com inc (CRM)</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />U.S. stock futures declined Thursday morning, pointing to a lower start on Wall Street as investors started weighing the possibility that stocks have run up too far and too fast ahead of the economy -- the economic recovery may not be as robust. The retail sector is in focus with several retailers reporting earnings. The tech sector could also experience pressure.<br /><br />On Wednesday, stocks ended lower with technology shares leading the decline, and the Nasdaq composite down nearly half a percent. Results from Salesforce.com (CRM) and Autodesk (ADSK) weighed on the sector as Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Microsoft (MSFT) were among the leading decliners in the Dow.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Futures lower on economic concerns; retail, tech in focus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/">Before the bell: Futures lower on economic concerns; retail, tech in focus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19245956/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-economic-concerns-retail-tec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adsk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/20070807161909990002.jpg" alt="" />Once upon a time, Mac users could brag they were much safer from malicious electronic attacks. After all, in the days before Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), when Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was the only uber-player in town, Windows was the perpetual malware target. Phishers, however, aren't discriminating; they're just looking for an account to plunge. So, both Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Microsoft users are threatened. Virus writers do tend to focus on the Windows operating system, which owns 90% of the OS market, <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html">but phishers are platform independent</a>.</p>
<p>Phishing involves attempts to get a user to reveal information about their accounts. Once the soon-to-be victim clicks that link or fills out a form, the "transaction" is complete -- no operating system interaction necessary. As a result, there really isn't any advantage to using a Mac over a PC.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/">Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244257/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eset</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>gmail</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hotmail</category><category>linkedin</category><category>linux</category><category>mac</category><category>malware</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>phishing</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>solaris</category><category>twitter</category><category>windows</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft latest to head into the sky: New cloud solution announced]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/msft-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Amazon, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>) is in the clouds. So are Google, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), EMC (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys" target="_blank">EMC</a>) and Cisco (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas" target="_blank">CSCO</a>). Now, Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) is joining them, having announced on Tuesday its new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WindowsAzure/">Windows Azure</a> cloud computing system. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN173933520091117" target="_blank">The new product will be released on January 1, 2010</a> -- a new solution for a new year.</p>
<p>Azure will deliver an online platform for the software development set to build their own mousetraps and provide plenty of storage space for users. Testing began a year ago, and full live version will be celebrated next year. For the first month, Azure will be free. The charges start in February.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft latest to head into the sky: New cloud solution announced</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/">Microsoft latest to head into the sky: New cloud solution announced</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN173933520091117>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-latest-to-head-into-the-sky-new-cloud-solution-announ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>Cisco</category><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>cloud</category><category>cloud computing</category><category>csco</category><category>emc</category><category>EMC Corp.</category><category>emc corporation</category><category>featured</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>windows</category><category>windows azure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Internet holds the answer to combat stress, but in small doses only]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p>Morale has plunged among military personnel in Afghanistan as a result of record violence in the war, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33908828/ns/us_news-military/ " target="_blank">according to the U.S. Army</a>. A battlefield survey found that the situation is particularly problematic for soldiers on their third and fourth combat tours, and junior enlisted soldiers are most likely to experience marital problems because of deployment. Though it's not a complete solution, the study did find that limited doses of technology - either through video games or internet access - can help.</p>
<p>The study, obtained by NBC News, revealed that more than 20% of soldiers are experiencing combat stress, and half of them are having difficulties getting professional help. Combat Stress units in Afghanistan, the report says, are "undermanned," and this type of unit has no presence in the southern part of Afghanistan, where most of the combat is taking place.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Internet holds the answer to combat stress, but in small doses only</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/">Internet holds the answer to combat stress, but in small doses only</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33908828/ns/us_news-military/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/internet-holds-the-answer-to-combat-stress-but-in-small-doses-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afghanistan</category><category>army</category><category>combat</category><category>nbc news</category><category>NbcNews</category><category>nintendo</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>soldiers</category><category>twitter</category><category>wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Twitter valuation off by half: NeXt Up Research]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" />Michael Moe knows how to make headlines: Talk about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> and predictably people will bite (I'm proof     <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Twitter_valuation_off_by_half'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>   of that). He led the team at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nextupresearch.com/Site/NEXT_up!.html">NeXt Up Research</a> that calculated the value of the micro blogging service and arrived at <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/analyst-twitter-worth-about-600-million.html">$526 million to $674 million</a> -- half what Twitter is generally believed to be worth.<br /></p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>The team estimates that Twitter will generate revenues of $114 million to $134 million in 2013. In 2014, Twitter is expected to post revenues of $126 million to $148 million. This is far more conservative than the valuation implied by the company's most recent round of venture capital investment, which puts the company's worth at more than $1 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Twitter valuation off by half: NeXt Up Research</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/">Twitter valuation off by half: NeXt Up Research</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/analyst-twitter-worth-about-600-million.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/14/twitter-valuation-off-by-half-next-up-research/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>Bing</category><category>dell</category><category>featured</category><category>Michael Moe</category><category>MichaelMoe</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>next up</category><category>NextUp</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>tweetie</category><category>twitter</category><category>valuation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/billgates.jpg" alt="" />It's easy to save the world when you've already taken care of yourself. But, we rely on these mavericks -- the wealthy who realize they can make a difference -- to do what we cannot on our own. So, it comes as a relief that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a>, founder of Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) believes <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/executivecompensation/">executive compensation</a> is still too high. </p>
<div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"> </div>
<p>It's a murky topic, and some forms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/regulation/">regulation</a>, Gates believes, won't help. In a discussion on philanthropy at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/92ndStreetY/">92nd Street Y</a> in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a>, where many of the people Gates criticized send their kids for early education, the former CEO and still rich guy cites the $1 million executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/salarycap/">salary cap</a> required by law in 1993 as a big mistake. While compensation has to be controlled,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112"> he believes this measure backfired and thinks that other, similar efforts are doomed to fail now</a>. </p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/">Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>92nd st y</category><category>92ndStY</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>compensation</category><category>compensation caps</category><category>CompensationCaps</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>ExecutiveSalary</category><category>gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkNewYork</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>salary cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" alt="" />Even the thought is hard to believe for anyone who's been watching Apple Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">AAPL</a>) over the long run. Once upon a time, the company was presumed dead, while Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) continued its march to market dominance. Today, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/" target="_blank">Apple's $180 billion</a> market value is evidence of a new era. Though it's still behind Microsoft's $250 billion, the company's rapid ascent and substantial market presence make at least speculation of catching up to the Redmond giant worth a few minutes of thought. </p>
<p>Microsoft is currently the most valuable technology company in the world, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/" target="_blank">according to a Reuters report</a>. Even Google, Inc (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), with its astounding brand recognition and position as gateway to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/internet/">internet</a>, is worth "only" $136 billion. Apple, which was once considered a computer company that sold into education and appealed to some graphics geeks, has reasserted itself as a major global presence.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/">Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>applestore</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iphone</category><category>itunes</category><category>itunes music store</category><category>itunes store</category><category>ItunesMusicStore</category><category>ItunesStore</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Investors are rethinking their snap judgments ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cy/" rel="tag">Cypress Semiconductor (CY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10624374/1/jpmorgan-plans-to-lift-salary-freeze.html?puc=aoljjc">JPMorgan Plans to Lift Salary Freeze </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10624066/1/retail-therapy-is-cheaper-than-ever.html?puc=aoljjc">Retail Therapy Is Cheaper Than Ever </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says that as numerous stories are mulled over anew, the reasons for selling seem silly. </span><br /><br /> The lack of important data today forces market participants to revisit stories that got tossed out over the last few weeks simply because of earnings ennui. People are now doubling back to see what they have forgotten, or more important, why they sold certain stocks they most likely shouldn't have. <br /><br /> For example, why did JPMorgan (<a href="http://JPM">JPM</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=JPM">Cramer's Take</a>) go from $47 to $44? Bad loans? Credit quality? No, not really. Nothing like that. Why did Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GS">Cramer's Take</a>) go from $192 to the $170s? Some of it was Meredith Whitney, but there is also a sense of entitlement that makes the firm hated, as if somehow it is too much of a pariah to invest in.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Investors are rethinking their snap judgments </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Investors are rethinking their snap judgments </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-investors-are-rethinking-their-snap-ju/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>nvda</category><category>whr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU objects to Sun-Oracle deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oracle-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />It's not the first time this happened, and likely not the last. The European Commission has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5A85D120091110">objected</a> to Oracle's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) acquisition of Sun Microsystems (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) after U.S. authorities have approve the $7.4 billion deal.<span id="midArticle_1"></span><br /><br />The issue is Sun's database product, MySQL, which European antitrust authorities fear wouldn't be developed after the acquisition since Oracle has its own database and therefore it would hurt competition in the database business. Together, the two will have quite a large share of the market, the EU contends. The U.S. authorities <a href="http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/November/09-at-1210.html">disagrees</a>, saying there are enough competitors in the market and that "the merger is unlikely to be anticompetitive."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EU objects to Sun-Oracle deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/">EU objects to Sun-Oracle deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/eu-objects-to-sun-oracle-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/twitter-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://twitter.com/bloggingstocks" target="_blank">Twitter</a> ecosystem may be changing constantly, but most of that comes on the back of individual developers and outside companies. They beat on Twitter APIs to create new products that may win them glory, recognition or cash. Over the past month, though, Twitter itself has gotten into the game, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/181588/twitter_tries_luring_users_back.html" target="_blank">releasing or announcing a handful of new features</a>.</p>
<p>A new function for "retweeting" (echoing another's tweet to your own followers), changes to how trending topics are managed, and the ability to create lists are new tools intended to engage users ... on the <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter.com website</a>. Considered within the context of Twitter's changed terms of service this year, the upgrades may be part of a broader ad-based revenue plan.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/">New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>ad revenue</category><category>ad.ly</category><category>advertising</category><category>app store</category><category>apple</category><category>apple itunes</category><category>comscore</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>itunes</category><category>magpie</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>retweet</category><category>seesmic</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>trending topics</category><category>tweet</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>tweets</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="186" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/intel-logo-blue.jpg" />The latest litigation has <em>Intel Inside. </em></p>
<p>The State of New York is going after <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) over antitrust allegations. State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is accusing the largest chip manufacturer in the world that it is <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33620538/ns/business-us_business/">trying to secure a global monopoly</a> for microprocessors. <br /></p>
<p>For several years, Cuomo said that Intel has pushed the likes of <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) to agree to the exclusive use of Intel's gear in exchange for billions of dollars in payments. The hefty cash outlays have given what Cuomo called a "stranglehold" on the market.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/">Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33620538/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19224425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andrew cuomo</category><category>AndrewCuomo</category><category>antitrust</category><category>attorney general</category><category>AttorneyGeneral</category><category>dell</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hpq</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/msft.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) Google Apps project has gained steam (and customers) since its introduction a few years ago. Although it's not yet a true competitor to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Office juggernaut, it is making headway.</p>
<p>The "software as a service" camp is doing nothing but speeding up, as small and large businesses would like to offload expensive software installations and just use the Internet as a vehicle for getting things done across boundaries and time zones. Microsoft, though, is not capitulating just yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/">Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Microsoft-Turns-on-a-Dime-to-Beat-Back-Google-Apps-68549.html?wlc=1257335734>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19222625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Apps</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Software as a service</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" />For the first half of 2010, almost two thirds of <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125694262091319627.html?mod=BOL_hps_highlight">money managers are bullish</a>, according to <em>Barron's</em>. In fact, 54% are bullish, and 5% are "very bullish." Responses suggest that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is expected to gain another 5% by the end of the year. </p>
<p>According to <em>Barron's</em>, "Today's bullish investors see the major stock indexes making steady progress through next June, amid signs the U.S. economy is on the mend after a searing recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/">Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125694262091319627.html?mod=BOL_hps_highlight&amp;page=sp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218760/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barrons</category><category>clean technology</category><category>CleanTechnology</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>energy</category><category>financials</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>it spending</category><category>ItSpending</category><category>metals</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mining</category><category>money managers</category><category>MoneyManagers</category><category>msft</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings highlights: Baidu, Dreamworks, Honda, Microsoft, Target, Verizon ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bkc/" rel="tag">Burger King Hldgs (BKC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/symc/" rel="tag">Symantec Corp (SYMC)</a></p><p>Here are some highlights from last week's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" target="_blank">earnings coverage</a> from BloggingStocks:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys"><strong>AK Steel Holding Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AKS</a>) reported better-than-expected <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/ak-steel-u-s-steel-report-better-than-expected-q3-results/">Q3 results</a> but shares fell anyway. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas"><strong>Baidu Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>) posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/">strong Q3 results</a> but shares sold off on a disappointing guidance. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burger-king-holdings-inc/bkc/nys" target="_blank"><strong>Burger King Holdings Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burger-king-holdings-inc/bkc/nys" target="_blank">BKC</a>) said lower <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/burger-king-profit-falls-misses-the-street/">Q1 earnings</a> fell short of analysts expectations. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas" target="_blank"><strong>Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas" target="_blank">DWA</a>) topped <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/dreamworks-dwa-q3-earnings-beat-estimates/">Q3 profit</a> and revenue estimates, lifting shares. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/geron-corporation/gern/nas"><strong>Geron Corp.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/geron-corporation/gern/nas">GERN</a>) posted a narrower-than-expected <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/geron-corp-spikes-on-narrower-than-forecast-3q-loss/">Q3 loss</a>, sending shares sharply higher. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-ltd-honda-giken-kogyo-kabushiki-kaisha-japan/hmc/nys"><strong>Honda Motor Co. Ltd.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-ltd-honda-giken-kogyo-kabushiki-kaisha-japan/hmc/nys">HMC</a>) reported lower <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/daimler-honda-slump-following-earnings-reports/">Q2 earnings</a> and sales on weak demand for cars. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings highlights: Baidu, Dreamworks, Honda, Microsoft, Target, Verizon ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/">Earnings highlights: Baidu, Dreamworks, Honda, Microsoft, Target, Verizon ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/earnings-highlights-baidu-dreamworks-honda-microsoft-target/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AK Steel</category><category>AKS</category><category>Baidu</category><category>BIDU</category><category>BKC</category><category>Burger King</category><category>Corning</category><category>Dreamworks</category><category>DWA</category><category>earnings</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>GERN</category><category>Geron</category><category>HMC</category><category>Honda</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>LDK</category><category>LDK Solar</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Novo-Nordisk</category><category>NVO</category><category>PAR Technology</category><category>PTC</category><category>SAP</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Stanley</category><category>SXE</category><category>Symantec</category><category>SYMC</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>TMK</category><category>Torchmark</category><category>Verizon</category><category>VZ</category><category>WINN</category><category>Winn-Dixie</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/rsz_msftlarge.jpg" />Although <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has much of the business world wrapped around at least some of its software, the largest software company in the world is mostly known for its consumer products. Names like Windows, Zune, Windows Mobile, Sidekick, and Xbox are household terms (well, in gadget households perhaps). </p>
<p>Still, with all those names, why hasn't Microsoft formed some kind of overall consumer ecosystem so that all these products fit, work, and play together seamlessly?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/">Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215967/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Danger Sidekick</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sidekick phone</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wii dethroned, Nintendo profit halved]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/wii_logo_220.jpg" />If the Wii were still cool, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo</a> (OTC: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) wouldn't have had to take a heavy hand to its full-year earnings forecast. The company's profit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59S1IO20091029?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522">fell 52% year-over-year for the past quarter</a>, due in large part to a decline in the game's popularity. Demand has slipped, with <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) gaining ground with the core market of zealous gamers. Also, it's seen its position eroded by <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a>, which is picking up some momentum as a gaming platform. </p>
<p>Nintendo's Q3 operating profit dropped to JPY64 billion ($709 million), falling far short of the analyst estimate of JPY90 billion. For the year ending March 2010, the company has chopped its forecast to JPY370 billion, far lower than the analyst expectation of JPY442.8 billion. </p>
<p>After dominating the gaming industry for the past three years, Nintendo's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Wii/">Wii</a> gave up its position in the top spot to Sony's PlayStation 3 last month. The company has also been hurt by an increase in the value of the yen, which has hurt all Japanese exporters. Yet, even by local standards, Nintendo isn't measuring up. Its stock price is down 28% this year, compared to a 14% increase in the Nikkei 225. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/">Wii dethroned, Nintendo profit halved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59S1IO20091029?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>gaming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iphone</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft games</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftGames</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendods</category><category>nintendowii</category><category>ntdoy</category><category>playstation3</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sony playstation</category><category>sony playstation 3</category><category>SonyPlaystation</category><category>SonyPlaystation3</category><category>wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>